Thursday, 17 August 2017



There is a palpable frenzy in the mainstream news media around the Trump Presidency. Reports have morphed from being merely biased into outright and direct abuse against every word he utters. There is a terror abroad and it isn't a fear of nasty Muslims or Russians or demented North Korean leaders. One can only conclude that these media people are terrified that Trump might be winning the war in which they are directly and frantically engaged.

The forces of (let's call them) the establishment don't seem to understand that Trump is merely a symptom of a problem THAT IS NEVER GOING TO GO AWAY now that the public at large are waking up to the nature of our fraudulent 'Democracy'. Impeach Trump and they will get something more powerful, more plain-speaking and, possibly, much more horrible.

The usual suspects are very busy creating the conflicts that serve them so well. The 'Alt Right' protest in Charlottsville was organised by one Jason Kessler, on record as a supporter of Obama and Clinton and also an ex-member of the 'leftist' 'radical' Occupy movement..... i.e. the 'Nazi White Supremacist' protest was led by an establishment phoney. He has a Jewish-sounding name but hey, maybe the man a Mexican.
What Trump called "The Alt-Left", the Antifa and other assorted leftists are famously funded by Communist Statist (i.e. globalist) NGOs owned by the likes of George Soros. 
Therefore both sides of the Charlottsville confrontation were led by the same people.

The protest and the tragic death that ensued has been UNIVERSALLY used by the media to screech abuse at Trump. CNN is a comical spectacle of wall-to-wall Trump hatred. The presentation gets doubly hysterical when the orange demon steps forward and speaks obvious truth. 

Trump said, "We should wait until we know the facts". The Charlotteville argument looks like one that, in the end, he might win if this report is correct.

The enemy is the finance parasite that ALWAYS attacks its host. It cares nothing for the indigenous people of any country. no more than the blood-thirsty anti-Christian Bolsheviks cared for the peoples of the old Soviet Union that they slaughtered in their tens of millions. It cares nothing for the ethnic minorities whose causes it espouses in order to destroy any coherence in the core population. It hates white culture in the USA and Europe and black culture in Africa. It invades, occupies and steals the loot. It goes by the name of AngloZionism, International Finance, The Military/Industrial Complex, Globalism, Imperialism.

Spiritually, it is Luciferianism. 

The leaders of this satanic racket appear to be the faction condemned by Jesus Christ 2000 years ago....the Sanhedrin, the Scribes and the Moneylenders against whom He so severely warned the Jewish people.

At the time some Jews listened, thank God, and built the foundations of western civilisation for the following 1600 years or so.

In the context of the politics of power, which is the struggle for ascendancy between competing interest groups, one thing is pretty clear about Jewish tribal behaviour.

It appears that Jews are not white in any sense other than that is the colour of their skin.

Or are they? Sort it out people. Whose side are you really on? Is this path you allow your leaders to tread going to work out for you guys in the end.

The Soviet Bolshevik hegemony was accurately seen by everybody at the time as a Jewish victory (and a Jewish horror). How did that work out for innocent Jews caught up in Nazi-occupied territories after the Soviet slaughter of the indigenous middle classes? During the weeks after the Soviets were driven out of those territories by the German army they took the blame for everything and suffered revenge on a most horrific scale?

Luciferianism is manned by the cunning moral scum of all nations. They stick Jews out front and centre whether they are its leaders or not. The truth is that we do not know who the real leaders of the enemy forces are. They remain hidden. Most likely they are from all creeds and colours.

Here's the Question: Is the overt (apparently) Jewish drive for power a sign of Jewish superior intelligence or more likely, perhaps, a sign that the 'Tribe' is a collection of spiritually captured idiots?

Today there are Jewish voices in the wilderness ... Atzmon, Shamir and others. It is about time they got a wider and fair hearing from their own people. It is getting dangerous for everybody ... already.


Thursday, 2 February 2017



Western civilisation's only common religion is the only one we MUST believe. The one against which it is forbidden to blaspheme. The religion against which no heresy is allowed. You know, the one against which expressions of doubt can land you in prison, even if you are an 87-year-old grandmother.

The Gospel narrative of this religion has been as carefully constructed and as determinedly protected as any medieval 'Apostles Creed'. And its central and defining article of faith IS A PROVABLE lie.Provable by scientific physical evidence recovered by experiments that are repeatable to this day. This is one major reason why the taboo against its contradiction and why the punishments are necessary. Germar Rudolf, a Ph.D. student at the Max Planck Institute who first carried out investigations into the ferrocyanide content of the walls of various buildings inside the Auschwitz camp, having demonstrated that the supposed "human gas chambers" were no such thing, summed up our modern reality:

'The Holocaust' has been transmogrified into an ideology which bears all the elements of a religion, with its own God (the Jewish people as a collective Messiah), its Devil (Adolf the Unspeakable), its own high priests (orthodox Holocaust historians), its temples (Holocaust museums and memorials) with their Holy Relics (bits of Jewish hair, shoes, spectacles, luggage, etc.), its worldwide holiday as ordained by the U.N. (the “Day of Remembrance,” 27th January), its Saints (the alleged victims of the concentration camps), its prophets (the eyewitnesses), its Pilgrimages (to the former German concentration camps), its Inquisition (the media, and in many countries even courts of law punishing heretics), and its Believers (the innocent victims of Holocaust propaganda).

This new religion serves many Jews in general and the Apartheid State of Israel in particular as a sword and shield in their interactions with gentiles and foreign nations. To prevent a new “Holocaust,” Israel is allowed to commit any cruelty, wage any war, violate any international law it likes. They get away with (almost) anything. But this new superstition also serves many other nations as a bogeyman to make their own population accept wars. First they accuse a foreign leader of a Holocaust – committed or planned – then they start the war. Serbia, Iraq, Iran. It works shockingly well (transcribed from an interview).1

Thus we must not question and we, most certainly, must not mock the suffering of our new Messiah, a Messiah that just happens to be one and the same as the Messiah of The (Orthodox Jewish) Talmud, 'The Jewish People'.
That Christ condemned the Pharisees (who founded Orthodox Judaism and The Talmud's 'oral tradition') as “Liars! Of Satan!” appears to carry little influence over the mind of the modern Christian whose leaders have forgotten their own faith and sold out entirely to the very people Christ came to earth to warn the Jewish people against.
Here are just a few of Christ's condemnations of this leadership:

But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.
Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel.
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess. Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.
 Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

How little has changed over the past 2000 years?

And here is the condition of society that has been manufactured for us.

One can say what one likes about Christ or Buddha or Islam today and the state will not care in the slightest. Muslims, however, do tend to care. Hence western abuse of Islamists tends towards the slaughter of persons rather than the (more dangerous) insulting of their religion. Christian churches (apart from the lunatic, literalist Christian Zionists [who are not recognisably Christian at all]) do not appear to take their own religion in any way seriously, as their support for Pharisaical lies and indifference to blasphemies against Christ plentifully demonstrates. 

We might ask ourselves why this monstrous fabrication has been constructed in the first place. It is a creation of 'The Jewish People' themselves? What do we mean when we say 'The Jewish People'? Most Jews are as cluelessly brainwashed (or, perhaps, more so) on the issue as any gentile. They believe the story because it has been repeated to them ad nauseam and because willing liars have been wheeled out to address them continuously on an ongoing basis over the past many decades. Repetition, not reality, has created this “truth”.

It is interesting that when the 'gas chamber' stories were first broadcast in 1943 by the BBC, the Head of the British Secret Service advised various parties not to believe the stories because "... we have no evidence..." Here is his letter:

27 August, 1943 

“In my opinion it is incorrect to describe Polish information regarding German atrocities as “trustworthy.’ The Poles, and to a far greater extent the Jews, tend to exaggerate German atrocities in order to stoke us up. They seem to have succeeded. Mr Allen and myself have both followed German atrocities quite closely. I do not believe that there is any evidence which would be accepted in a Law Court that Polish children have been killed on the spot by Germans when their parents were being deported to work in Germany, nor that Polish children have been sold to German settlers. As regards putting Poles to death in gas chambers, I do not believe that there is any evidence that this has been done, There have been many stories to this effect, and we have played them up, in P.W.E. [Psy Warfare Executive] rumours without believing that they had any foundation. At any rate there is far less evidence than exists for the mass murder of Polish officers by the Russians at Katyn. On the other hand we do know that the Germans are out to destroy Jews of any age unless they are fit for manual labour. I think that we weaken our case against the Germans by publicly giving credence to atrocity stories for which we have no evidence. These mass executions in gas chambers remind me of the story of employment of human corpses during the last war for the manufacture of fat, which was a grotesque lie and led to the true stories of German enormities being brushed aside as being mere propaganda...”

 (signed) V Cavendish-Bentinck 

As a result of this statement, a telegram was sent off from the Foreign Office to Washington the same day, copied to Moscow, requesting that no allusion be made to 'gas chambers' re German atrocities in Poland. It was sent by the head of the British Psychological Warfare Executive, Victor Cavendish-Bentinck: 

Neither does this great lie serve the interests of ordinary Jews. As a well-known local Jewish sceptic of the very tall tale said to me, “When the facts about this matter are revealed, those who learn the appalling truth will not always be nice people like you and me.”

Ordinary Jews are placed in potentially great danger by the very existence of this lie. So why was it invented?One credible explanation goes like this. It appears that the elite that govern us, the persons that constitute authority over and direct the instruments of the 'deep state', hide behind 'the Jewish People'.

A vicious, predatory group, a collaboration of usurious money magicians, and utterly ruthless Jewish and Gentile criminals have created a wall of “super-victims” from behind which the can continue to carry out their operations and attacks against mankind. They have created a paranoid, hive-mind victim-hood in their target population, the Jews, that energises a compulsive collective political activism in defence of their people, a people who have been trained to interpret any criticism of or attack against the ruling elite as an existential threat against their own very lives. It has been and remains an operation of genius. A Satanic, and let us fairly call it 'Satanic', instrument of war for use against an entire world destined (as The Talmud and like publications, would have it) for enslavement under the coming 'Jewish King'.

Perhaps God has allowed the existence of this transparent and very obvious nonsense, this hypnotic gibberish, to lead us back to Him. 

Let us hope and pray this is the narrative that the King of creation has laid out for His rebellious Prince. 

A deadly trap into which that Prince has already fallen. The outrageous lie that cannot but be ever more widely exposed. 

The lie that will open the eyes of humanity to the Satanic nature of those who govern and the spiritual Satanism and inevitable disaster associated with any human prioritising of the pursuit of power for its own sake.

Those who discover this truth must endeavour to reassure our Jewish brothers and sisters that we mean them no harm. Although it is a great shame that so many Jews carelessly buy into this false narrative, ordinary Jews, let us remember, were the primary target of this hoax and its first and most traumatised victims. They were deceived as all of us, at one time or another, were deceived. We must appeal to them as Christ appealed to them, to free their minds from enslavement to the Rabbis and the banking Satanists that lead them.
When they acknowledge the truth we will welcome them with open arms because their salvation is our salvation also. 

We will be bound into the Jewish narrative to the very end of the story which, if the Good Book is right, is “Revelation”, the revelation of all important truth and the liberation from our centuries of enslavement as the Divine narrative appears to have decreed.


1 G.R. The Holocaust as a Religion, 10.5.02

Thursday, 28 April 2016

Frank Lowy, Westfield and Croydon


The founder and owner of Westfield, Frank Lowy, was a Haganah fighter (terrorist), one of those who killed hundreds of Palestinian civilians and unarmed soldiers (according to Wikipedia) during the 1948 Palestine War when the masses of Palestinians were driven out of the country. 

Once Israel was stolen he left Israel (for 9 months of every year) and went into the property business in Australia. 

FIFTY DAYS before 9/11 he and Larry Silverstein bought the World Trade Centre in New York (how unlucky was that?) at a time when there was a requirement for massively expensive renovation and asbestos removal from the buildings:

'To maintain the trade center as class-A office space commanding top rents, the [Port Authority] would have had to spend $800 million rebuilding the electrical, electronic communication, and cooling systems.' The removal of asbestos raised this figure to well in excess of $1 billion.

Lowy and Silverstein double-insured the WTC for multiple terrorist attacks (meaning they could claim for the same damage twice if two planes or attacks were involved) and collected $4.577 billion for WTC's 1, 2, 4 and 5 and $861 million for WTC7. Total $ 5,438,000,000

This man is obviously a business genius ... or something.

What is very difficult to stand is that the centre of Croydon is being demolished to make way for a new Westfield Centre. So my town centre is going to be owned by someone who obviously (putting it kindly) should be in jail, someone deeply involved in the murder of 3000 New Yorkers on 9/11 and who knows what else?

What kind of sheep are we?

I have it on good authority from somebody who works inside the organisation that Westfield operates a "Jewish glass ceiling". There is a level of management beyond which a gentile cannot ascend.
"They have a couple of token non-Jewish goons they wheel out to create a different impression but everyone inside the Company knows how it works."

Lowy is obviously very close to the heart of the British (and International) establishment. This is the kind of squillionaire who funds the think-tanks that set out and enforce the anti-racist, multi-cultural, tolerant, secular agenda on our culture.

It is obvious that this man has no genuine interest in such principles, other than in the fact their imposition serves to divide-and-rule and further the interests of the globalist banking oligarchy that owns our governments. 

The societal impartiality promoted by our leaders is as genuine as Westfield anti-racism and Israeli multi-culturalism.

Fake morality as an instrument for the imposition of centralised tyranny describes Communism in a nutshell.

Westfield and the rest of their corporate/banking pals ARE government.

The terrible thing is that this is our collective reality.

The good thing is that they can't hide it any more.

The truth is out and THE TRUTH WILL SET US FREE.

Tuesday, 6 October 2015



Anyone paying attention knows that the state-sponsored terror that was once openly condemned by the European Parliament has become the central art-form and political driver of the 21st Century historical narrative. 

It is worth reading the European Parliament's 1990 resolution on this issue (below). This pronouncement was a follow-up to an investigation by Italian authorities into the Bologna train station massacre in which 80 Italian commuters died.....murdered, the official investigation later revealed, by NATO Intelligence services, our supposed 'protectors'.

Europeans should read this and weep. 

Where are those who would intend to so defend the European peoples today?

We know that nothing useful resulted from this resolution but our system and its placemen and women appear to have lost even the intention to do the right thing.

European Parliament resolution on Gladio  (1990)
On November 22, 1990, the European Parliament passed a resolution on Operation Gladio.
Joint resolution replacing B3-2021, 2058, 2068, 2078 and 2087/90

A. having regard to the revelation by several European governments of the existence for 40 years of a clandestine parallel intelligence and armed operations organization in several Member States of the Community,

B. whereas for over 40 years this organization has escaped all democratic controls and has been run by the secret services of the states concerned in collaboration with NATO,

C. fearing the danger that such clandestine network may have interfered illegally in the internal political affairs of Member States or may still do so,

D. whereas in certain Member States military secret services (or uncontrolled branches thereof) were involved in serious cases of terrorism and crime as evidenced by, various judicial inquiries,

E. whereas these organizations operated and continue to operate completely outside the law since they are not subject to any parliamentary control and frequently those holding the highest government and constitutional posts are kept in the dark as to these matters,

F. whereas the various 'Gladio' organizations have at their disposal independent arsenals and military ressources which give them an unknown strike potential, thereby jeopardizing the democratic structures of the countries in which they are operating or have been operating,

G. greatly concerned at the existence of decision-making and operational bodies which are not subject to any form of democratic control and are of a completely clandestine nature at a time when greater Community cooperation in the field of security is a constant subject of discussion,


1. Condemns the clandestine creation of manipulative and operational networks and Calls for a full investigation into the nature, structure, aims and all other aspects of these clandestine organizations or any splinter groups, their use for illegal interference in the internal political affairs of the countries concerned, the problem of terrorism in Europe and the possible collusion of the secret services of Member States or third countries;

2. Protests vigorously at the assumption by certain US military personnel at SHAPE and in NATO of the right to encourage the establishment in Europe of a clandestine intelligence and operation network;
3. Calls on the governments of the Member States to dismantle all clandestine military and paramilitary networks;
4. Calls on the judiciaries of the countries in which the presence of such military organizations has been ascertained to elucidate fully their composition and modus operandi and to clarify any action they may have taken to destabilize the democratic structure of the Member States;
5. Requests all the Member States to take the necessary measures, if necessary by establishing parliamentary committees of inquiry, to draw up a complete list of organizations active in this field, and at the same time to monitor their links with the respective state intelligence services and their links, if any, with terrorist action groups and/or other illegal practices;
6. Calls on the Council of Ministers to provide full information on the activities of these secret intelligence and operational services;
7. Calls on its competent committee to consider holding a hearing in order to clarify the role and impact of the 'Gladio' organization and any similar bodies;

8. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council, the Secretary-General of NATO, the governments of the Member States and the United States Government."


Sunday, 5 July 2015



There is no safety for honest men except by believing all possible
evil of evil men.”
-- Edmund Burke

"Power always thinks it has a great soul and vast views beyond the comprehension of the weak.That is the deep root of the combination of savagery and self-righteousness that infects the imperial mentality — and in some measure, every structure of authority and domination."---- US President John Adams

"The two enemies of the people are criminals and government"-- Thomas Jefferson

On the 10th anniversary of the 7/7 Bombing here is a reminder that the inconvenient facts relating to this day have not been mentioned, never mind discussed, in the mainstream media. 

We must guard against becoming weary of repeating doubts (and certainties) relating to the ongoing false-flag outrages that continue to define our political present and fashion our futures. We are not as helpless as we might sometimes be tempted to think.

I visited my MP, Gavin Barwell (Con., Croydon Central) to raise the following questions. Having discussed various highly dubious and damaging-if-false assertions that are allowed to persist unchallenged in the public domain, I left him the document below with a request that he get back to me with whatever answers to the seven questions he could unearth. 

He said he would look into the issues but has (unsurprisingly) failed to respond. 

Nonetheless, it is surely continues to be a worthwhile exercise to make our representatives aware of the astonishing anomalies associate with the official 7/7 narrative.

Please read the following and continue to circulate these details, which conflict severely with the official narrative of the day. Please copy, print and post (or email) to your local M.P. and demand answers.

The 'London Bombings' and the lies we have been told about 7/7 must never be allowed to disappear from public consciousness. If the state believes it can safely lie to us about such matters, it will believe it can get away with absolutely anything.


Three Holes in the Floor of the Edgware Road Carriage

Evidence was given by different witnesses, including the train driver (Ray Whitehead), that clearly describe three large separate holes in front of two different sets of doors in the Edgware Road carriage. People fell into all three holes. Two emerged from the holes . One died in the third hole. The original report on the Edgware Road explosion (from mark Honigsbaum of the Guardian who was on the train) had the train lifting off the tracks and being derailed (i.e. bomb(s) underneath the train). The driver described all the access panels in the floor of the first coach (the bomb(s) killed people in the second carriage) being 'flipped open' from underneath.

References to evidence: Ray Whitehead (Nov 16 pm, 58:9-15) Daniel Belsden (Nov 11 am, 9:13-22) David Matthews (Nov 17, am, 105:21-106:18) John McDonald  (Nov 9, 42:18 – 44:11). Find all here at

In what way is any of this compatible with a single suicide 'suicide bomber' carrying a rucksack full of black pepper and hydrogen peroxide?

Body Count reveals no Bombers

The First Official Body Count on Two of the Trains was One Body Short

At the 7/7/ Inquest in November 2010 Dr. Morgan Costello gave evidence that he was asked to attend two scenes, Edgware Road and Aldgate, for the 'purposes of certifying the extinction of life'. He counted six bodies at Edgware Road and seven bodies at Aldgate and declared these as 'life extinct'. The enormous anomaly, that passed completely unreported in the press, was that the numbers should have been seven and eight if we count the bodies of the bombers. No similar count seems to have been carried out on the other (Russell Square ) train but we do know a little about the behaviour of the Russell Square bomber, Germaine Lindsay, before his demise.

Are not these two body counts extraordinarily powerful evidence that there were no suicide bombers on the Aldgate and Edgware Road two trains?
Evidence presented to the Inquest did claim that Tanweer and Khan were blown into a large number different pieces by their bombs……but how would this be consistent with the fact that almost all the other serious injuries in those coaches were lower limb injuries to feet and legs?

The Explosives

Here is a timeline for the 7/7 explosives narrative as it developed:

The first analysis came from a genuine expert. This is surely the most reliable commentary on the nature of the bombs that went off that morning. The problem is that it would have been all-but-impossible for four young men from Leeds to get their hands on such materials.

On 12 July 2005, Superintendent Christophe Chaboud, chief of French anti-terrorism Coordination Unit who was in London assisting Scotland Yard with its investigation, confirmed to The Times that,‘The nature of the explosives appears to be military, which is very worrying….the material used were not homemade but sophisticated military explosives …’ (Nafeez Ahmed The London Bombs, p.24)

On 13th July it was stated that these were of ‘C4’ explosive....London explosives have military origin – [Science Daily. LONDON, July 13 (UPI)]: Forensic scientists told the newspaper the construction of the four devices detonated in London was very technically advanced, and unlike any instructions that can be found on the Internet.’

From The Independent on July 14th: ‘A bath filled with explosives has been found at a house in Leeds that was the “operational base” for the London suicide bombers
17th July 2005 The Observer: ‘22 lbs TATP in the bath.’

The TATP story survived but faded away in 2007 then, when the 7/7 Kingston trial came along in the summer of 2008 all trace of the TATP story had gone.

Now the explosives were made of black pepper and hydrogen peroxide. The idea of the four heating up Hydrogen Peroxide in their kitchen to the point where it would make an explosive mix with black pepper is simply laughable. How could they test that their ‘bombs’ were going to go off. Were they going to go lurching across the country with this kind of bomb sloshing about in their rucksacks. Has anybody ever made a bomb out of this mixture? If such a bomb did explode could it possibly have caused the devastation created on 7/7?

There is much written online that mocks these materials as potential tools of mass destruction. Do we not require a Public Inquiry on this issue alone. The changing storyline above surely makes no sense at all.

How would four inexperienced Muslims have known how to reduce the hydrogen peroxide to the right concentrations safely?
Why was no chemical analysis of the blast burns inside the carriages carried out? 

….more seriously

Why No Post-Mortems?

Another astonishing fact that emerged during the 2010-11 7/7 Inquest was that no post mortems were carried out on the bodies of the victims. A very great deal about the nature of and distance from the explosions could have been discovered from such examinations. The effects of different explosives on flesh are well-known. Such post-mortems would have provided some definitive information that would have at least ruled out some possible explosives from consideration as the source material of the blasts. What could possibly explain such an oversight other than the desire to avoid creating conflicts with a fabricated narrative.

 Why were there no post-mortems on any of the victims? (definitive information about the explosives could have been gained from such investigations)

Why Suicide?

Moving on to another very obvious (but irresolvable) question: why would terrorists who wished to wreak havoc and punish British people for the UK’s involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan choose to blow themselves up along with their victims? These were very crowded trains. They could have set a timed detonator and quietly slipped off the trains a stop or two early, leaving their bags on the floor amongst the feet of dozens of incurious passengers. Where would have been the risk in that? Surely such activists would better serve their cause by continuing and not terminating their mission?

Another obvious question:

Why, in the most CCTV-rich environment on earth, is there so little footage of the four available? Why is it that the few pictures that are available mostly contain no other identifiable persons that could confirm the accuracy and veracity of these pictures? Surely it should have been possible to construct a water-tight case against the four from the CCTV alone?


There were four uncannily accurate drills (or rehearsals) carried out before the 7/7 bombings:
1) The BBC Panorama ‘management exercise’ programme of May 2004 during which a panel of ‘managers’, including Peter Power (see below) and Michael Portillo, discussed how they would deal with a terror attack on London that revealed itself to them through mock news reports as the show progressed. The scenario they had to deal with turned out to be one overground and 3 underground explosions taking place over a short space of time during the morning rush hour.

2) The contemporaneous 7/7 drill: on 7/7 itself Peter Power conducted a terror drill that shadowed the cataclysm as it happened – over the same three tube stations at more or less the same time. On the afternoon of 7/7 he was interviewed on Radio 5’s ‘Drivetime’ programme:
POWER: …at half-past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for, er, over, a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing upright!

3) Atlantic Blue: held over 5-8 April, 2005. All echelons of government participated in this large terror-drill. The Independent reported after July 7th that “By an extraordinary coincidence, all the experts who formulate such plans are together in a meeting at the headquarters of the London Ambulance Service – and they are discussing an exercise they ran three months ago that involved simulating four terrorist bombs going off at once across London.”

4) Operation Hanover: London’s police hold a little-known yearly terror-drill. On 2005 it just happened to be held on 1-2 July. Its game-plan was threefold: three ‘simultaneous’ bomb attacks on three underground stations. The police have been reticent about discussing this astounding precursor event, mere days before 7/7. They only revealed it in 2009.

What is the probability that practice drills should be going on in exactly the same stations at exactly the same time as surprise terrorist attacks occur?

Germaine Lindsay, cool and then confused

Germaine Lindsay drove from Aylesbury to meet the other (let’s call them) bombers in Luton railway station. He arrived an hour before them and decided to take a little nap. He received a parking ticket while asleep in his car. Were he a terrorist he obviously would have known that he would have had only four hours left to live.

Germaine Lindsay was one extraordinarily relaxed suicide-bomber. 
A station attendant called Mr. Patel gave testimony to the Inquest that a man he identified as Germaine Lindsay arrived on the concourse of King’s Cross station and asked to talk to “The Duty Manager”. He said it was, “Very important.” Mr Patel remarked that it was very unusual for a member of the public to know the exact name for the person in charge of the station. Normally people asked for ‘the supervisor’ or ‘the manager’. At this time there was chaos on the concourse. The metal grills had been pulled down and shut at the front of the station. Passengers were not being allowed through the barriers. A crowd had built up and people were starting to abuse staff. Numbers of ‘Community Support Officers’ who looked like police were milling around the area trying to manage the situation. No wonder Lindsay was confused. He must have decided to try to speak to someone who ‘was in on the game’ to explain to him what was going on. The most obvious explanation of his behaviour is that it would have puzzled and alarmed him that the drill had started before he, ‘the bomber’, had caught their trains. Perhaps a chilling possibility occurred to him. When Mr. Patel returned with the duty manager Lindsay had gone.

And More

There are many, many other serious anomalies and matters requiring investigation in the official narrative.

1. Train Times
The train times presented huge problems for the official narrative causing the Home Secretary to change the story after it was realised that the 7.40 they were said to have caught had been cancelled. Then the next train arrived 23 minutes late at King’s Cross giving the bombers only three minutes to buy four RETURN tickets (think about that one), cross the track by bridge and board the last possible train that makes it just feasible they could have reached the bombed trains in time.

2. Khan
On the 5th July 2005, Mohammed Siddique Khan took his pregnant wife to Dewsbury Hospital in West Yorkshire. She was bleeding and there was obviously something wrong. Doctors examined Hasina Patel and said that there was a ‘threatened miscarriage’. They sent her home and booked her in for a scan on the 7th. Mrs Patel has never told the time they got home but afterwards Mohammed Khan said that he was ‘going to see his friends’. Hasina Patel never saw or heard from her husband ever again. She miscarried on July 6th . At the 7/7 Inquest there was ‘evidence’ (peculiar and surely untrustworthy) presented of a mobile phone text-message exchange between Khan and Germaine Lindsay at 4.35am on the morning of the 6th July. Would Khan really have abandoned his desperate wife for a whole day while she was in that condition? Khan was a highly respected in his community and by the headmistress of the special school in which he worked as a classroom assistant. The police had used him to mediate between rival gangs in local disputes. He was trusted by all sides. Hilary Benn had taken Khan on a tour of the House of Commons. He was not known to be politically radical. Quite the opposite. He was protective of the good name of his community and was eager to maintain good relations with the local white community. Bearing this in mind it is likely that the reason the police have film of Khan is that he was helping them ‘keep an eye on’ any worrisome Muslim elements in his locality. He was not a troublemaker, he was a healer and a fixer.
The most likely explanation for Khan’s disappearance on the 6th is that he told his minder for the 7/7 exercise that he was not going to be able to make it. . He would have been told to see that the others could make it without him. The bombings were not going to be called off but……now he had presented his minders with a problem that had only one possible solution. His goose was cooked.

This would also explain why the attendant at the filling station where Tanweer filled his car (and argued about the change he was given) said he only saw one other person in Tanweer’s car. Hasib Hussain alone (the bus-bomber) was in the car and, unknown to the pair of them, Khan was by now already dead. This would also explain why the now-suppressed BBC radio 5 news reports from the late morning of the seventh said that two men had been shot in Canary Wharf (rather than three, the supposed train bombers. Hussain had been separated from the others).

Those who have travelled to Beeston and spoken to locals report that, like Khan, Hussain and Tanweer had shown no inclination in their communities towards political or religious radicalism.

The Evidence against ‘The Four’

Looking at the detail of latest narrative laid out before the 7/7 Inquest, it must be admitted that it is now just physically possible that the four caught the last possible train at Luton and rushed from King’s Cross Thameslink to the various subway platforms before detonating their deadly cargos. However, their relaxed demeanour in the very few still photos presented as evidence militates against the probability that they were rushing about madly that morning (especially with all that liquid explosive slopping about on their backs).

Why too in the most CCTV-rich environment on earth are there only a couple of very poor pictures of the four, one at Luton, one at Thameslink, the date and time stamps on which could have easily been photoshopped. Could the photos of Khan have been used from the ‘practice run’ the four carried out on 29th June 2005, just eight days earlier?

The mobile phone evidence places them all on the correct train at the right time. Three things about this though. Firstly, this is new evidence that was not released in the previous 2006 hearing. Why? Second, is it likely that these men would have been texting each other on train they had all boarded together. Finally, this is the kind of evidence easily faked. It is letters and numbers on a piece of paper.

Khan and Tanweer could easily have been talked into making the Jihadi videos that have played such a large part in aiding the public to accept their guilt. They were employees, well-paid for two days work, the practice on June 29th and for the day itself. They were told that the exercise has to be made as realistic as possible. The film would be in the hands of the station staff and other authorities giving them a possible means of intercepting the four. The on-camera ‘threats’ from Khan and Tanweer are vague and unspecific. When Hasina Patel first saw these videos it was reported that she said, “That’s not my husband.” Her brother thought it was Khan. It is most likely that she meant, “ I know him. He would never say such things.”
The ‘bombers’ all had four or more mobile phones each; one of their own private phones and at least three other (so-called) ‘operational’ phones that they are supposed to have used to confound anyone who might attempt to track their communications and obstruct their diabolical plan. It is most likely that these phones were supplied by their minder and that their holding them allowed their ‘handlers’ to track Tanweer and Lindsay down in Canary Wharf after they had panicked and gone on the run, presumably (and naively) hoping to tell their story to the British press who are mostly based there.

Government sources might deny it but there are 2 competing narratives that describe what happened on 7/7/05

1) The official story of four suicide bombers murdering 52 people and injuring hundreds by exploding four bombs on three tube trains and one bus on the morning of 7/7.

2) Forces embedded within the establishment carried out a false-flag attack against the British people. As with nearly all false-flag events, patsies were set up to take the blame for the crime. The four Muslims were completely innocent actors paid to participate in a concurrent anti-terror 'drill'. 

In a court of law physical evidence always trumps excuses, allegations, observations or any other kind of verbal contribution to a case…..



Which of the above narratives more closely matches the facts of the case?